Naval Surface Warfare Center contract for engineering services awarded to Evolving Resources, Inc. for over $11.6 million

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,660,642 ($11.7M)

Contractor: Evolving Resources, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-09-29

End Date: 2012-09-30

Contract Duration: 2,923 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 21

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200412!055634!1700!BW19A !NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER, PO!N0017804D4049 !A!N! !Y!0002 ! !20040929!20050930!867800120!867800120!867800120!N!EVOLVING RESOURCES,INC !80 WOOD ROAD !CAMARILLO !CA!93010!58296!111!06!PORT HUENEME !VENTURA !CALIFORNIA!+000000001543!Y!N!000000000000!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!20060331!B! ! !A! !A!N!U!2!021!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!A!N!N!B! ! ! !A!A!00 !A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: CAMARILLO, VENTURA County, CALIFORNIA, 93012

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $11.7 million to EVOLVING RESOURCES, INC. for work described as: 200412!055634!1700!BW19A !NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER, PO!N0017804D4049 !A!N! !Y!0002 ! !20040929!20050930!867800120!867800120!867800120!N!EVOLVING RESOURCES,INC !80 WOOD ROAD !CAMARILLO !CA!93010!58296!111!06!PORT HUENEME !VENT… Key points: 1. Contract value exceeds $11.6 million, indicating a significant investment in engineering services. 2. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The duration of the contract is substantial, spanning over 8 years, implying long-term service needs. 4. The primary service category is engineering, a critical component for defense operations. 5. The contract was awarded by the Naval Surface Warfare Center, a key defense agency. 6. The contractor, Evolving Resources, Inc., has secured a substantial portion of the contract value.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The total award amount of $11,660,641.67 for engineering services over an eight-year period appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar large-scale engineering contracts within the Department of Defense would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) contract type suggests that while costs are tracked, the final price is fixed, offering some predictability.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The data shows 21 bids were received, suggesting a robust competitive environment. A high number of bidders generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition for this contract is beneficial for taxpayers as it likely resulted in a more competitive price and a wider range of innovative solutions being considered.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the various naval operations and projects requiring specialized engineering expertise. Services delivered include engineering support crucial for the development, maintenance, and modernization of naval systems. The geographic impact is likely concentrated around naval facilities and operational areas, primarily in California where the contractor is located. Workforce implications include the employment of engineers and technical staff by Evolving Resources, Inc. to fulfill the contract requirements.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) contract type can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not managed diligently, although the fixed fee component provides a ceiling.
Long contract durations, over 8 years, can introduce risks related to technological obsolescence or shifts in program requirements.
Reliance on a single contractor for a significant period may limit flexibility in adopting new technologies or approaches.

Positive Signals

Award through full and open competition suggests a competitive process that likely yielded a fair price.
The substantial number of bids received (21) indicates strong market interest and a healthy competitive landscape.
The contract's focus on engineering services aligns with critical defense needs, suggesting strategic importance.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a vital component of the broader professional services market supporting the defense industry. The market for defense engineering services is substantial, driven by the continuous need for modernization, maintenance, and development of complex military systems. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within large-scale defense procurement data for similar engineering support contracts.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a set-aside provision. The primary impact on the small business ecosystem would be indirect, through potential opportunities if Evolving Resources, Inc. chooses to subcontract portions of the work.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), which is responsible for ensuring contractor performance and compliance. Accountability measures are inherent in the contract terms, including performance standards and payment schedules. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, which record award details. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Contracts
Department of Defense Engineering Services
Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) Awards
Professional Services Contracts
Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee Contracts

Risk Flags

Contract duration exceeds 8 years, potentially leading to risks associated with technological obsolescence or changing requirements.
Cost-plus-fixed-fee contract type requires diligent oversight to ensure cost efficiency and prevent potential overruns.
Reliance on a single contractor for an extended period may limit flexibility and access to alternative solutions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $11.7 million to EVOLVING RESOURCES, INC.. 200412!055634!1700!BW19A !NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER, PO!N0017804D4049 !A!N! !Y!0002 ! !20040929!20050930!867800120!867800120!867800120!N!EVOLVING RESOURCES,INC !80 WOOD ROAD !CAMARILLO !CA!93010!58296!111!06!PORT HUENEME !VENTURA !CALIFORNIA!+000000001543!Y!N!000000000000!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!200

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EVOLVING RESOURCES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-09-29. End: 2012-09-30.

What is the historical spending pattern for Evolving Resources, Inc. with the Department of Defense?

Analyzing the historical spending for Evolving Resources, Inc. with the Department of Defense requires accessing comprehensive contract databases. While this specific contract represents a significant award of over $11.6 million, understanding the company's broader engagement involves looking at all their awarded contracts. Factors to consider include the total value of contracts awarded over time, the types of services provided, the agencies they have served, and the consistency of their contract awards. A pattern of consistent, high-value awards might indicate strong past performance and a trusted relationship with the DoD, whereas sporadic or declining awards could suggest otherwise. Without access to a complete historical ledger, it's difficult to definitively characterize their spending pattern, but this single large award points to a significant engagement.

How does the pricing structure (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) compare to other contract types for similar engineering services?

Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contracts are common in defense and R&D where the scope of work may not be precisely defined at the outset, or where innovation is a key component. In a CPFF contract, the government pays the contractor's actual costs plus a fixed fee representing profit. This structure incentivizes the contractor to control costs to maximize their fee relative to the fixed profit amount. Compared to Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contracts, CPFF offers more flexibility for the government if requirements change but carries a higher risk of cost growth if not managed well. Other types like Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) tie the fee more directly to performance metrics. For complex engineering services, CPFF is often chosen to balance flexibility with cost control, though FFP is preferred when requirements are very well-defined to ensure the lowest possible price.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) typically associated with engineering services contracts of this nature?

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for engineering services contracts like this one often revolve around technical performance, schedule adherence, and cost control. For technical performance, KPIs might include the accuracy and completeness of engineering designs, the successful resolution of technical challenges, and compliance with relevant engineering standards and specifications. Schedule adherence would be measured by the contractor's ability to meet project milestones and delivery deadlines. Cost control KPIs would focus on managing actual costs within the anticipated range for the fixed fee, and reporting variances effectively. Additionally, customer satisfaction, innovation contributions, and safety performance can also be critical KPIs, depending on the specific project objectives and the terms negotiated in the contract.

What is the potential impact of this contract on the broader defense engineering market?

This contract, valued at over $11.6 million and awarded through full and open competition, signifies a substantial commitment by the Naval Surface Warfare Center to securing specialized engineering expertise. Its impact on the broader defense engineering market can be multifaceted. Firstly, it validates the capabilities of Evolving Resources, Inc., potentially enhancing their reputation and competitiveness for future contracts. Secondly, the competitive bidding process, involving 21 bidders, indicates a dynamic market with multiple firms vying for significant defense work. This level of competition can drive innovation and efficiency across the sector. Lastly, the contract's duration suggests a sustained demand for specific engineering skills, potentially influencing workforce development and resource allocation within the defense engineering community.

Are there any specific technological advancements or innovations expected from this contract?

The provided data does not explicitly detail specific technological advancements or innovations expected from this contract. However, engineering services contracts, particularly those with the Department of Defense, often aim to support the development, integration, or modernization of complex systems. Given the nature of the Naval Surface Warfare Center's mission, it is plausible that this contract supports advancements in naval technology, platform modernization, or the development of new operational capabilities. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure can accommodate some level of research and development, allowing for exploration of novel solutions. Further details on the specific project objectives would be needed to identify anticipated innovations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 21

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 80 WOOD ROAD, CAMARILLO, CA, 93010

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $29,527,795

Exercised Options: $26,822,689

Current Obligation: $11,660,642

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017804D4049

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline