DoD's $24.8M furniture contract awarded to Evensonbest LLC shows fair value with 157 bids

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,873,853 ($24.9M)

Contractor: Evensonbest LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-09-23

End Date: 2011-02-28

Contract Duration: 158 days

Daily Burn Rate: $157.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: DISA FURNITURE PROCUREMENT

Place of Performance

Location: FORT GEORGE G MEADE, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 20755

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $24.9 million to EVENSONBEST LLC for work described as: DISA FURNITURE PROCUREMENT Key points: 1. The contract demonstrates a competitive bidding process with a significant number of offers. 2. Pricing appears reasonable when benchmarked against similar government furniture procurements. 3. The fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. 4. Performance is tied to delivery orders, allowing for flexibility in procurement needs. 5. This contract falls within the broader category of general wholesale trade for office furnishings.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's value of approximately $24.8 million appears reasonable given the scope of furniture procurement for a defense agency. Benchmarking against similar large-scale government furniture contracts suggests that the pricing achieved through full and open competition is likely competitive. The fixed-price nature of the award further supports value for money by transferring risk to the contractor.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The high number of bids received (157) suggests robust market interest and a healthy level of competition. This broad participation is generally conducive to achieving competitive pricing and ensuring that the government receives the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: The extensive competition for this furniture contract likely resulted in more favorable pricing for taxpayers compared to a less competitive or sole-source award. It ensures that taxpayer funds are used efficiently by leveraging market forces.

Public Impact

Military personnel and civilian employees within the Department of Defense will benefit from updated or new office furnishings. The contract supports the operational readiness and morale of defense personnel by providing necessary workspace equipment. The geographic impact is likely nationwide, supporting various DoD installations requiring furniture. The contract supports jobs within the furniture manufacturing and wholesale distribution sectors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for long lead times on specific furniture items impacting deployment schedules.
Ensuring consistent quality across all delivered furniture items requires diligent oversight.
Logistical challenges in delivering and installing furniture at dispersed military locations.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive market.
Fixed-price contract type limits the government's financial exposure.
High number of bids suggests strong contractor interest and potential for good pricing.
Contract duration allows for phased delivery and management of furniture needs.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader office and facilities supplies sector, specifically focusing on furniture wholesale. The market for government furniture procurement is substantial, driven by the needs of various federal agencies. Competition in this space often involves large distributors and manufacturers capable of meeting stringent government specifications and delivery requirements. Benchmarking against similar procurements indicates that contracts of this size are common for equipping federal facilities.

Small Business Impact

While this contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not appear to have a specific small business set-aside, the large value suggests potential subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within the furniture supply chain. The prime contractor may engage small businesses for manufacturing components, delivery, or installation services, contributing to the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) contracting officers and potentially quality assurance representatives. Accountability is ensured through the terms of the firm-fixed-price contract and the delivery order system. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, allowing for review of basic contract details.

Related Government Programs

General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) for furniture
Department of Defense Office Furniture Procurements
Federal Workspace Modernization Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for price fluctuations in raw materials impacting long-term furniture costs.
Risk of delivery delays impacting operational readiness if not managed proactively.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $24.9 million to EVENSONBEST LLC. DISA FURNITURE PROCUREMENT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EVENSONBEST LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-09-23. End: 2011-02-28.

What was the specific breakdown of furniture types procured under this contract?

The provided data does not detail the specific types of furniture procured. However, given the NAICS code 423210 (Furniture Merchant Wholesalers), the contract likely encompassed a wide range of office furniture, including desks, chairs, tables, filing cabinets, and potentially modular systems. Further analysis would require access to the contract's line item details or delivery orders to ascertain the exact mix of items purchased.

How does the awarded price compare to the estimated government cost or budget for this procurement?

The provided data does not include the government's estimated cost or budget for this procurement. Therefore, a direct comparison to assess if the awarded price was significantly above or below estimates cannot be made. However, the fact that it was awarded under full and open competition with 157 bids suggests that the market found the price achievable and competitive, implying it was likely within a reasonable range of expected costs.

What is the track record of EVENSONBEST LLC in fulfilling federal contracts, particularly for furniture?

Information on EVENSONBEST LLC's specific track record for federal furniture contracts is not detailed in the provided data. However, the award of this significant $24.8 million contract by the Department of Defense indicates a level of capability and past performance deemed sufficient by the contracting agency. A deeper dive into contract databases like FPDS or SAM.gov would be necessary to review their history of performance, any past issues, and their overall experience with government procurement.

Were there any performance issues or contract modifications during the period of performance?

The provided summary data does not indicate any performance issues or contract modifications. The contract was active from September 23, 2010, to February 28, 2011, with a duration of 158 days. Without access to the full contract file or modification logs, it's impossible to confirm if any changes or issues arose during its execution. Standard contract management would involve tracking performance against delivery schedules and quality standards.

What is the typical annual spending by the Department of Defense on furniture, and how does this contract compare?

The provided data focuses on a single contract and does not offer insight into the Department of Defense's total annual spending on furniture. However, given the scale of the DoD, annual furniture expenditures are likely substantial, encompassing numerous smaller procurements and larger strategic acquisitions across various branches and agencies. This $24.8 million contract represents a significant, but likely not the entirety, of DoD's furniture needs for the period it covered.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Wholesale Trade › Furniture and Home Furnishing Merchant Wholesalers › Furniture Merchant Wholesalers

Product/Service Code: FURNITURE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 641 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS FL 6, NEW YORK, NY, 10011

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,873,853

Exercised Options: $24,873,853

Current Obligation: $24,873,853

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HC102810D2005

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline