Army awards $13.8M for material transportation and disposal, highlighting remediation services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,781,403 ($13.8M)
Contractor: Tpmc-Energysolutions Environmental Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-01-16
End Date: 2008-09-30
Contract Duration: 258 days
Daily Burn Rate: $53.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL OF MATERIAL
Place of Performance
Location: ALEXANDRIA, LICKING County, OHIO, 43001
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $13.8 million to TPMC-ENERGYSOLUTIONS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, LLC for work described as: TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL OF MATERIAL Key points: 1. Contract value of $13.8M for transportation and disposal of material. 2. Services provided fall under Remediation Services (NAICS 562910). 3. Contract awarded by the Department of the Army. 4. Procurement method was Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources. 5. Delivery Order type indicates a specific task within a larger contract. 6. Contract duration was 258 days. 7. Fixed Price contract type suggests cost certainty for the government.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $13.8 million for material transportation and disposal appears to be a specific task order. Without comparable task orders or a broader contract vehicle benchmark, assessing value for money is difficult. The fixed-price nature provides some cost certainty, but the unit costs or pricing structure are not detailed here. The award amount itself is moderate for a federal contract of this nature.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources.' This suggests that while the competition was intended to be broad, certain sources were excluded for specific reasons, potentially limiting the pool of bidders. The number of bids received (6) indicates some level of competition, but the exclusion of sources warrants further investigation into the rationale and its impact on price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The exclusion of sources, even with 6 bidders, may have limited the potential for the most competitive pricing, potentially costing taxpayers more than if all qualified sources had been allowed to bid.
Public Impact
Benefits the Department of Defense by ensuring proper transportation and disposal of materials. Services delivered include remediation activities related to material handling. Geographic impact is likely concentrated in Ohio, where the contract was performed. Workforce implications involve specialized personnel for transportation and environmental remediation.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition due to exclusion of sources may impact price competitiveness.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it hard to assess effectiveness.
- Fixed-price contract could lead to contractor cost-cutting if not closely monitored.
Positive Signals
- Fixed-price contract provides budget certainty.
- Awarded by a major federal agency (Department of the Army).
- Specific remediation services address environmental compliance needs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Environmental Remediation Services sector, a critical component of the broader waste management and remediation industry. This sector involves specialized services for cleaning up contaminated sites and managing hazardous materials. Federal spending in this area is driven by regulatory compliance, infrastructure projects, and defense-related environmental responsibilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve other government contracts for hazardous waste disposal, site cleanup, and transportation of regulated materials.
Small Business Impact
Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting is not available for this specific delivery order. The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the prime contractor, TPMC-ENERGYSOLUTIONS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, LLC, is not explicitly identified as a small business in this data. Further analysis would be needed to determine if any subcontracting opportunities were directed towards small businesses.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the fixed-price contract type, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated by the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS), where contract awards are reported, though detailed performance data may not always be publicly accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Remediation Services
- Hazardous Waste Management
- Defense Logistics Agency Contracts
- Department of Energy Environmental Contracts
Risk Flags
- Limited competition due to source exclusion.
- Potential for unforeseen site conditions impacting cost and schedule.
- Environmental liability risks.
- Contractor performance risk.
Tags
transportation, disposal, material, remediation-services, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, fixed-price, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition-after-exclusion-of-sources, ohio, environmental-services, naics-562910
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $13.8 million to TPMC-ENERGYSOLUTIONS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, LLC. TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL OF MATERIAL
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TPMC-ENERGYSOLUTIONS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-01-16. End: 2008-09-30.
What is the track record of TPMC-ENERGYSOLUTIONS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, LLC with the federal government, particularly in remediation services?
TPMC-ENERGYSOLUTIONS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, LLC has a history of federal contracting, primarily within the Department of Defense and other agencies requiring environmental services. Their awards often center around hazardous waste management, site remediation, and transportation of regulated materials. Analyzing their past performance on similar contracts, including any past performance evaluations or contract disputes, would provide a clearer picture of their reliability and capability. A review of their contract history might reveal patterns in contract types, values, and agencies served, offering insights into their specialization and experience level in handling complex environmental projects for the government.
How does the $13.8 million award compare to typical federal spending on material transportation and disposal for the Army?
The $13.8 million award for material transportation and disposal by the Department of the Army is a moderate-sized contract for a specific delivery order. Federal spending on such services can vary significantly based on the scope, type of material, and geographic location. Larger, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts or major cleanup initiatives can involve hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars over their lifespan. This specific award likely represents a defined task within a broader program. Benchmarking against similar, discrete delivery orders for remediation and disposal services would provide a more accurate comparison, but generally, this amount is within the typical range for specialized environmental services required by the military.
What are the primary risks associated with this type of remediation services contract?
Key risks for this type of remediation services contract include unforeseen site conditions that could escalate costs and timelines, potential environmental liabilities if cleanup is incomplete or causes secondary contamination, and regulatory non-compliance. For the government, risks also involve contractor performance failures, cost overruns (especially if the fixed-price contract doesn't adequately account for contingencies), and potential delays impacting military readiness or environmental protection goals. Ensuring the contractor has robust safety protocols and environmental management systems is crucial to mitigate these risks. The 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources' also introduces a risk that the most capable or cost-effective provider may have been excluded.
What does the 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources' procurement method imply for this contract's outcome?
This procurement method implies that the initial solicitation was intended for full and open competition, but specific sources were subsequently excluded. The reasons for exclusion could range from security concerns, past performance issues, or specific technical requirements that only a subset of potential bidders could meet. While 6 bidders participated, the exclusion means the government did not receive offers from all potentially capable vendors. This could potentially limit the breadth of innovation and price competition compared to a truly unrestricted full and open competition. The justification for excluding sources would be critical to understanding if this decision was necessary and served the government's best interest.
How has federal spending on remediation services evolved, and where does this contract fit in?
Federal spending on remediation services has been a consistent and significant area of expenditure, driven by environmental regulations (like RCRA and CERCLA), base realignment and closure (BRAC) initiatives, and ongoing environmental stewardship responsibilities across agencies like the DoD, DOE, and EPA. Spending often fluctuates based on major cleanup projects, infrastructure investments, and evolving environmental standards. This $13.8 million contract represents a specific, task-order level expenditure within the broader federal remediation services portfolio. It fits into the category of operational environmental support, ensuring compliance and proper management of materials, rather than a large-scale, multi-year site remediation project, though it could be a component of one.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCT NONBUILDING FACILITIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 5005 W ROYAL LN STE 216, IRVING, TX, 75063
Business Categories: Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $13,781,403
Exercised Options: $13,781,403
Current Obligation: $13,781,403
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912P407D0003
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-01-16
Current End Date: 2008-09-30
Potential End Date: 2008-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2020-09-26
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)