DoD Awards $45.5M Campus Feeders Project to Hensel Phelps Construction Co. Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $45,544,834 ($45.5M)
Contractor: Hensel Phelps Construction CO
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2015-09-29
End Date: 2019-09-30
Contract Duration: 1,462 days
Daily Burn Rate: $31.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF BASE - CAMPUS FEEDERS PHASE I - NORTH
Place of Performance
Location: FORT GEORGE G MEADE, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 20755
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $45.5 million to HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF BASE - CAMPUS FEEDERS PHASE I - NORTH Key points: 1. Significant contract awarded for campus infrastructure development. 2. Hensel Phelps Construction Co. is a major player in the construction sector. 3. Full and open competition suggests a potentially competitive bidding process. 4. Project duration of nearly four years indicates a substantial undertaking.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The award amount of $45.5M for a multi-year construction project appears within a reasonable range for large-scale infrastructure. However, without specific per-unit cost breakdowns or detailed project scope, a precise value assessment is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows for a wider range of contractors to participate.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for essential infrastructure development, with the expectation that competitive bidding will ensure a fair price for the services rendered.
Public Impact
Enhances critical campus infrastructure for military personnel. Supports local economy through construction jobs and material sourcing. Long-term project may cause temporary disruptions to campus operations.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown for value assessment.
- Potential for cost overruns in long-duration construction projects.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Project addresses essential infrastructure needs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a significant area of federal spending. Benchmarks for similar large-scale campus infrastructure projects would typically range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars, depending on scope and complexity.
Small Business Impact
While the prime contractor is Hensel Phelps Construction Co., a large entity, the contract details do not specify any subcontracting goals for small businesses. Further investigation would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Army's acquisition process, utilizing full and open competition, suggests a degree of oversight. However, ongoing monitoring of project progress, budget adherence, and quality control would be crucial for accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Long project duration increases risk of cost escalation.
- Lack of detailed scope in award notice.
- No explicit mention of small business subcontracting goals.
- Potential for disruption to base operations during construction.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, md, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $45.5 million to HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO. IGF::OT::IGF BASE - CAMPUS FEEDERS PHASE I - NORTH
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $45.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2015-09-29. End: 2019-09-30.
What specific infrastructure improvements does 'Campus Feeders Phase I - North' entail, and how do these align with the Army's long-term strategic goals for the base?
The contract details do not specify the exact nature of the 'Campus Feeders' improvements. This phase likely involves upgrading or installing essential utility infrastructure such as power, water, or communication lines within a specific northern section of the campus. Understanding the precise scope is crucial to assess its alignment with the Army's long-term strategic goals for modernization and operational efficiency at the base.
Given the nearly four-year duration, what are the primary risk mitigation strategies in place to manage potential cost escalations and schedule delays?
For a project of this duration, risk mitigation likely involves robust contract clauses addressing inflation, material price fluctuations, and unforeseen site conditions. The firm-fixed-price structure places much of this risk on the contractor, Hensel Phelps. However, the government would typically employ project management oversight, regular progress reviews, and contingency planning to address potential delays and cost overruns proactively.
How will the effectiveness of the completed 'Campus Feeders' infrastructure be measured to ensure it meets the intended operational improvements and long-term reliability?
Effectiveness will likely be measured through a combination of post-construction testing, system performance monitoring, and user feedback from base operations. Key performance indicators could include system uptime, energy efficiency improvements, reduced maintenance requirements, and the successful integration of new infrastructure with existing base systems. Formal acceptance testing and a warranty period will also contribute to assessing effectiveness and reliability.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W912DR15R0005
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 4437 BROOKFIELD CORPORATE DR STE 207, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $45,544,834
Exercised Options: $45,544,834
Current Obligation: $45,544,834
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912DR15D0032
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2015-09-29
Current End Date: 2019-09-30
Potential End Date: 2019-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-04-29
More Contracts from Hensel Phelps Construction CO
- 200112!000146!9700!ZD47 !pentagon Renovation Management !mda94701c2001 !A!N!*!N! !20010918!20121129!791702194!791702194!063322085!n!hensel Phelps Construction CO !4437 Brookfield Corporate !chantilly !va!20151!61672!013!51!pentagon !arlington !virginia !+000145000000!n!n!000000000000!y300!restoration Activities !C2 !construction !1000!NOT Discernable or Classified !233320!*!*!3! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !A !N!L!2!003!B! !D!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $1.6B (Department of Defense)
- C103157: Surgery, Radiology, and Laboratory Medicine (srlm) Building Construction — $756.4M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- ECB3 Base BID — $711.3M (Department of Defense)
- Zone 1 Tyndall AFB, FL — $650.0M (Department of Defense)
- Award Construction Contract for Repair of Administrative Spaces, Various Locations, Oahu, Hawaii — $378.7M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)