DOD Awards $12.8M Barracks Construction Contract to Greenleaf-ECI at Fort Riley
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $12,781,121 ($12.8M)
Contractor: Greenleaf-Eci a Joint Venture
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-06-30
End Date: 2008-09-27
Contract Duration: 455 days
Daily Burn Rate: $28.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: 6-COF WHOLE BARRACK, FT. RILEY- 07 FUNDS
Place of Performance
Location: FORT RILEY, GEARY County, KANSAS, 66442
State: Kansas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $12.8 million to GREENLEAF-ECI A JOINT VENTURE for work described as: 6-COF WHOLE BARRACK, FT. RILEY- 07 FUNDS Key points: 1. Contract awarded for barracks construction at Fort Riley. 2. Greenleaf-ECI Joint Venture secured the $12.8M contract. 3. Competition was full and open, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 4. The sector is Commercial and Institutional Building Construction.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The award amount of $12.8M for barracks construction appears reasonable given the contract duration of 455 days. Benchmarking against similar construction projects would provide a more definitive assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically fosters competitive bidding and can lead to better price discovery. The presence of 3 bids indicates a degree of market interest.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by securing the best value through a competitive process.
Public Impact
Improved housing for military personnel at Fort Riley. Supports the construction industry and local economy in Kansas. Ensures readiness and quality of life for soldiers.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Contract duration is relatively long (455 days).
- No specific mention of small business participation.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector can fluctuate based on government infrastructure needs and economic conditions. Benchmarks for similar military construction projects are essential for detailed analysis.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business (ss: false, sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business subcontracting opportunities were included or pursued.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Army awarded this contract, implying oversight from this agency. The firm fixed price structure offers some cost control. Further review of performance reports and audits would be necessary for a complete oversight assessment.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of small business participation.
- Limited data on bid comparison.
- No information on performance during execution.
- Absence of per-square-foot cost analysis.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, ks, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $12.8 million to GREENLEAF-ECI A JOINT VENTURE. 6-COF WHOLE BARRACK, FT. RILEY- 07 FUNDS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GREENLEAF-ECI A JOINT VENTURE.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $12.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-06-30. End: 2008-09-27.
What was the total value of bids received, and how did Greenleaf-ECI's bid compare to the baseline estimate?
The provided data does not include the total value of all bids received or the government's baseline estimate. Knowing this would allow for a more precise assessment of the competitive landscape and whether the winning bid represented exceptional value. Comparing the winning bid to the independent government estimate is a standard practice for evaluating procurement effectiveness.
Are there any performance concerns or delays associated with this contract, given its duration?
The data indicates the contract was awarded in June 2007 and completed in September 2008, spanning 455 days. While the duration is noted, there is no information provided regarding performance issues, delays, or contract modifications. Post-award performance reviews and contract close-out documentation would be necessary to assess any potential risks realized during execution.
How does the per-square-foot cost of this barracks construction compare to similar projects in the region or for the military?
The provided data lacks specific details on the square footage of the barracks or comparable project costs. To assess effectiveness, a detailed cost breakdown and comparison with industry benchmarks for military barracks construction in Kansas or similar climates would be required. This would help determine if the $12.8 million expenditure was cost-efficient.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCT NONBUILDING FACILITIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W912DQ06R0050
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 3303 GILLHAM RD, KANSAS CITY, MO, 05
Business Categories: American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Emerging Small Business, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $12,781,121
Exercised Options: $12,781,121
Current Obligation: $12,781,121
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912DQ07D0045
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-06-30
Current End Date: 2008-09-27
Potential End Date: 2008-09-27 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-09-14
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)