Dod Awards $15.25M for Dfac Construction to Rand Enterprises, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $15,251,038 ($15.3M)
Contractor: Rand Enterprises, Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-12-08
End Date: 2012-12-08
Contract Duration: 1,461 days
Daily Burn Rate: $10.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: COS DFAC
Place of Performance
Location: COLUMBIA, RICHLAND County, SOUTH CAROLINA, 29207
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $15.3 million to RAND ENTERPRISES, INC for work described as: COS DFAC Key points: 1. The contract value is $15.25 million. 2. RAND ENTERPRISES, INC. is the sole awardee. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources. 4. The contract duration is 1461 days.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $15.25 million for a DFAC (Dining Facility) is difficult to benchmark without specific details on size, scope, and location. However, for a project of this nature, it appears to be within a reasonable range, though potential for overspending exists if not managed tightly.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES'. This suggests an initial broad solicitation followed by a narrowing of sources, potentially limiting the competitive pool and impacting price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The $15.25 million expenditure represents taxpayer funds allocated to infrastructure development. The effectiveness of this spending depends on the final quality and cost-efficiency of the DFAC construction.
Public Impact
Construction of a new dining facility will impact service members by providing improved amenities and potentially better food service. The project supports the local economy in South Carolina through construction jobs and material procurement. The Department of the Army's investment in infrastructure demonstrates a commitment to troop welfare and readiness.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition due to exclusion of sources.
- Long contract duration (4 years) may lead to cost escalations.
- No indication of small business participation.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract type helps control costs.
- Awarded under full and open competition initially.
- Clear project scope (DFAC construction).
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on project complexity, location, and material costs. Benchmarks are typically assessed on a per-square-foot basis or by project type.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small businesses were not a direct awardee (sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses participated as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, implying oversight from this agency. The duration and value suggest regular reporting and milestone reviews would be in place to ensure accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to long contract duration.
- Limited competition may have resulted in a higher price.
- Lack of explicit small business participation.
- Contract awarded in 2008, potential for outdated pricing if not adjusted.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, sc, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $15.3 million to RAND ENTERPRISES, INC. COS DFAC
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is RAND ENTERPRISES, INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $15.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-12-08. End: 2012-12-08.
What was the rationale for excluding certain sources after the initial full and open competition?
The exclusion of sources after initial full and open competition typically occurs when only a subset of bidders meets specific technical qualifications, past performance requirements, or unique capabilities necessary for the project. This process aims to ensure that the final award is made to a contractor best suited for the complex needs of the project, though it can reduce the overall competitive pressure on price.
How does the cost per square foot of this DFAC compare to similar military construction projects?
Without the square footage and detailed specifications of the DFAC, a precise cost-per-square-foot comparison is not possible. However, the total award of $15.25 million for a 4-year project suggests a significant investment. Benchmarking would require data on similar-sized DFACs or barracks construction within the Department of Defense to assess cost-effectiveness.
What mechanisms are in place to ensure the quality of construction meets military standards within the fixed-price contract?
Under a Firm Fixed Price contract, the government typically relies on stringent inspection and acceptance criteria outlined in the contract's Statement of Work. Quality assurance representatives (QARs) from the Department of the Army are responsible for monitoring progress, ensuring compliance with specifications, and verifying that the final product meets all required military standards before final payment is made.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W9123608R0047
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 850 39TH ST STE101, NEWPORT NEWS, VA, 03
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Emerging Small Business, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $15,251,038
Exercised Options: $15,251,038
Current Obligation: $15,251,038
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W9123609D0014
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-12-08
Current End Date: 2012-12-08
Potential End Date: 2012-12-08 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-11-20
More Contracts from Rand Enterprises, Inc
- FT Jackson SC Dining Facility — $17.2M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)