DoD's $23M Soldier Support Center Contract Awarded to Rocky Hill Contracting Inc. via Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $22,952,170 ($23.0M)

Contractor: Rocky Hill Contracting Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-11-01

End Date: 2011-10-30

Contract Duration: 1,459 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: SOLDIER SUPPORT CENTER-LEE

Place of Performance

Location: FORT LEE, PETERSBURG CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23801

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $23.0 million to ROCKY HILL CONTRACTING INC for work described as: SOLDIER SUPPORT CENTER-LEE Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $22.95 million, was awarded for commercial and institutional building construction. 2. Rocky Hill Contracting Inc. secured the contract through full and open competition after exclusion of sources. 3. The contract duration was 1459 days, ending in October 2011. 4. The award falls under the Department of the Army within the Department of Defense. 5. The fixed-price contract type suggests a defined scope of work.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $22.95 million for a Soldier Support Center is within a reasonable range for construction projects of this nature. Benchmarking against similar government construction contracts would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded using 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating a competitive process that aimed to solicit bids from a broad range of qualified contractors. This method generally promotes price discovery and potentially better pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayers likely benefited from a fair market price for the construction services.

Public Impact

Construction of a Soldier Support Center impacts military personnel and their families by providing essential facilities. The project contributes to the local economy through construction jobs and material procurement. The successful completion of such infrastructure projects is vital for military readiness and morale.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Contract awarded in 2007, with completion in 2011; data may be outdated for current market analysis.
  • Specific details on the 'exclusion of sources' are not provided, which could impact the full scope of competition.
  • Lack of detailed cost breakdown makes it difficult to assess cost-effectiveness beyond the total award amount.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through a competitive bidding process, indicating potential for good value.
  • Fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
  • Project supports military personnel, a key government function.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector for the Department of Defense can fluctuate based on infrastructure needs and modernization efforts. Benchmarks would typically compare cost per square foot or per project type.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses participated in or benefited from this contract. Further investigation would be needed to determine the extent of small business involvement.

Oversight & Accountability

Standard government oversight processes would apply to ensure contract compliance and quality of construction. The 'Delivery Order' nature suggests it might be part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract, which has its own oversight mechanisms.

Related Government Programs

  • Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for outdated data.
  • Ambiguity in 'exclusion of sources'.
  • Lack of detailed cost breakdown.
  • No information on performance or disputes.

Tags

commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $23.0 million to ROCKY HILL CONTRACTING INC. SOLDIER SUPPORT CENTER-LEE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ROCKY HILL CONTRACTING INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-11-01. End: 2011-10-30.

What was the specific scope of work for the Soldier Support Center, and how did it align with the awarded price?

The scope of work likely included the design and construction of a facility to support soldiers' administrative, training, and welfare needs. The $22.95 million price would be assessed against the square footage, complexity of design, and specific amenities required. Without detailed project specifications, a precise value assessment is challenging, but the competitive award suggests it was deemed fair market value at the time.

Were there any performance issues or cost overruns during the contract's execution, and how were they managed?

The provided data does not contain information on performance issues or cost overruns. Typically, contract performance is monitored by the contracting officer's representative (COR). Any deviations from the fixed-price contract would require formal modification and justification, with impacts on taxpayer funds depending on the nature and resolution of the issues.

How effective was the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method in achieving the best value for this construction project?

This method aims to broaden competition while allowing for specific exclusions if justified (e.g., unique capabilities). Its effectiveness in achieving best value depends on the clarity of exclusion justifications and the responsiveness of the market. A robust competitive field, even with exclusions, generally leads to better pricing and quality than a sole-source award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: W9123607R0002

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 104 W 6TH ST, KENBRIDGE, VA, 23944

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $22,952,170

Exercised Options: $22,952,170

Current Obligation: $22,952,170

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W9123608D0011

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-11-01

Current End Date: 2011-10-30

Potential End Date: 2011-10-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-04-29

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending