DoD's $148M Global Hawk IDIQ Task Order Awarded to Northrop Grumman Without Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $148,319,321 ($148.3M)

Contractor: Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2013-05-15

End Date: 2014-05-14

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $407.5K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: ACAT 1D, GLOBAL HAWK, IDIQ TO1

Place of Performance

Location: SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92127

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $148.3 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION for work described as: ACAT 1D, GLOBAL HAWK, IDIQ TO1 Key points: 1. Significant contract value awarded without competitive bidding. 2. Sole source award to a major defense contractor. 3. Potential for higher costs due to lack of competition. 4. Aircraft manufacturing sector with high R&D investment.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $148.3 million for a single task order is substantial. Without a competitive benchmark, it's difficult to assess if this price is optimal. The firm-fixed-price contract type offers some cost certainty.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and may lead to less favorable pricing for the government compared to a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition raises concerns about the efficient use of taxpayer funds, potentially leading to overpayment for the goods or services.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the absence of competitive bidding. The reliance on a single contractor for this critical defense asset could pose supply chain risks. Lack of transparency in the procurement process can erode public trust.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of competition
  • Potential for inflated pricing

Positive Signals

  • Firm-fixed-price contract

Sector Analysis

This award falls within the aircraft manufacturing sector, which is characterized by high technological complexity and significant government investment. Benchmarks for similar large-scale defense procurements often involve extensive competition.

Small Business Impact

The awardee is a large corporation, and there is no indication that small businesses were involved in this specific task order. Opportunities for small business subcontracting were likely missed.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of Defense awarded this contract. Oversight is crucial to ensure the justification for a sole-source award is valid and that pricing is reasonable, even without competition.

Related Government Programs

  • Aircraft Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award raises concerns about price reasonableness.
  • Lack of competition limits potential cost savings.
  • Potential for contractor lock-in.
  • Limited transparency in the procurement process.

Tags

aircraft-manufacturing, department-of-defense, ca, delivery-order, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $148.3 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION. ACAT 1D, GLOBAL HAWK, IDIQ TO1

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $148.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-05-15. End: 2014-05-14.

What was the justification for awarding this significant contract sole-source, and were alternative competitive strategies considered?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves factors like unique capabilities, urgent needs, or the unavailability of other sources. Without further documentation, it's impossible to confirm the specific rationale. However, for a contract of this magnitude, a thorough review of competitive alternatives is expected to ensure best value for the government.

How does the pricing of this sole-source contract compare to historical data or industry benchmarks for similar aircraft systems?

Direct comparison is challenging without access to proprietary data or specific market research conducted by the agency. However, sole-source contracts inherently carry a higher risk of non-competitive pricing. The government should have performed robust price analysis, potentially using historical pricing for the Global Hawk program or comparable systems, to validate the reasonableness of the $148.3 million award.

What measures are in place to ensure the effectiveness and performance of the Global Hawk system under this contract, given the lack of competitive pressure?

Effectiveness is typically ensured through stringent contract performance requirements, milestones, and acceptance criteria within the firm-fixed-price contract. The Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) would likely oversee performance. However, the absence of competition means the government relies heavily on contract management and oversight rather than market forces to drive performance and innovation.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Northrop Grumman Corporation

Address: 17066 GOLDENTOP RD, SAN DIEGO, CA, 92127

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $178,897,549

Exercised Options: $153,228,714

Current Obligation: $148,319,321

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 128

Total Subaward Amount: $63,824,172

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA862013D3014

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2013-05-15

Current End Date: 2014-05-14

Potential End Date: 2014-05-14 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-07-15

More Contracts from Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation

View all Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending