DoD Awards $20.9M Facilities Support Contract to Northrop Grumman Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $20,927,500 ($20.9M)
Contractor: Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corp.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2003-08-29
End Date: 2006-09-28
Contract Duration: 1,126 days
Daily Burn Rate: $18.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE)
Sector: Other
Place of Performance
Location: FAIRFAX, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22033
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $20.9 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SPACE & MISSION SYSTEMS CORP. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a large, established defense contractor. 2. Services fall under facilities support, a broad category. 3. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 4. Contract duration of over 3 years indicates a significant need.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The award amount of $20.9M over 1126 days suggests an average annual value of approximately $6.2M. Without specific unit costs or service levels, a direct pricing comparison is difficult, but this appears to be a substantial contract for facilities support.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. This method generally promotes price discovery and can lead to more competitive pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by securing the best value through a competitive process.
Public Impact
Ensures continued operation of essential facilities for the Department of the Army. Supports military readiness and personnel by maintaining infrastructure. Potential for job creation within the facilities support sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes value assessment difficult.
- Potential for cost overruns in long-term facilities contracts.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical support services.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
- Contract duration indicates a stable, ongoing need for services.
- Northrop Grumman is a well-established defense contractor.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) encompass a wide range of activities including operating and maintaining buildings and other facilities. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on the type and scale of facilities managed.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded to Northrop Grumman, a large business. There is no indication of small business subcontracting in the provided data.
Oversight & Accountability
The use of full and open competition is a positive oversight mechanism. However, ongoing monitoring of performance and costs will be crucial to ensure accountability throughout the contract's life.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Support Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of detailed service scope.
- No mention of small business participation.
- Potential for scope creep over the contract duration.
- Limited insight into specific performance metrics.
Tags
facilities-support-services, department-of-defense, va, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $20.9 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SPACE & MISSION SYSTEMS CORP.. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is NORTHROP GRUMMAN SPACE & MISSION SYSTEMS CORP..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $20.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2003-08-29. End: 2006-09-28.
What specific facilities and services are included in this contract, and how do they align with the Army's operational needs?
The contract covers facilities support services, likely encompassing maintenance, repair, operations, and potentially security for various Army installations. A detailed breakdown of the specific facilities and the scope of services would be needed to fully assess alignment with operational needs and ensure efficient resource allocation.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate bids and will they be used for ongoing performance monitoring?
The provided data does not specify the KPIs used during the bidding process or for ongoing monitoring. Effective contract management relies on clearly defined and measurable KPIs to ensure the contractor meets performance expectations and delivers value for taxpayer money.
How does the pricing structure compare to industry benchmarks for similar facilities support contracts of this scale?
Without detailed service level agreements and specific cost breakdowns, a precise comparison to industry benchmarks is challenging. However, the $20.9M award over three years suggests a significant investment, necessitating careful review against comparable contracts to ensure cost-effectiveness.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE) (2)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Titan II Inc. (UEI: 016435559)
Address: 100 SUN AVENUE NE, STE-300, ALBUQUERQUE, NM, 01
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Federally Funded Research and Development Corp, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: DABK0103D0008
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2003-08-29
Current End Date: 2006-09-28
Potential End Date: 2006-09-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-07-26
More Contracts from Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corp.
- Federal Contract — $396.7M (Department of Defense)
- Dafis UDO Reconstruct W/O Advance — $263.9M (Department of Transportation)
- 200311!000104!5700!GV65 !esc/Fd !F1962897D0034 !A!N! !N!0089 !20030911!20040910!614227643!004179453!016435559!n!northrop Grumman Space & Missi!1800 Glenn Curtiss Drive !carson !ca!90746!11530!037!06!carson !LOS Angeles !california!+000171904350!n!n!000000000000!5840!radar Equipment, Except Airborne !c9e!all Other Supplies and Equipme!3000!not Discernable or Classified !334290!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!j!2!003!b! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !z!z!a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $162.0M (Department of Defense)
- Asip 1C2C Program — $130.1M (Department of Defense)
- Jitc Mission Contract — $128.3M (Department of Defense)
View all Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corp. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)